Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
---|---|---|---|
thighsqueezedlemonade | 2-1 | None |
Azorius Auras , Azorius Flash , Azorius Glyph , Azorius Repurposing , Azorius Synthesizer , Jeskai Repurpose , Selesnya Cage , Unclassified , Unknown Archetype
Assimilation Aegis ranks #233 out of approximately 339 cards in raw efficiency (top 69%).
Multi average: 49.1%
Performance compared to other Multi cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Assimilation Aegis is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Performance Efficiency: 0.00 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 3 mana, the average win rate in the format is 69.2%. Assimilation Aegis has a win rate of 66.7%, making it 3.6% worse than other 3-mana cards.
Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
---|---|---|---|---|
Warden of the Inner Sky | Creature — Human Soldier | 7 | 76.3% | 4 |
Spyglass Siren | Creature — Siren Pirate | 7 | 76.3% | 4 |
Regal Bunnicorn | Creature — Rabbit Unicorn | 7 | 76.3% | 4 |
Loran of the Third Path | Legendary Creature — Human Artificer | 7 | 76.3% | 4 |
Mockingbird | Creature — Bird Bard | 7 | 76.3% | 4 |
Novice Inspector | Creature — Human Detective | 7 | 76.3% | 4 |
Elspeth's Smite | Instant | 12 | 69.8% | 6 |
Sheltered by Ghosts | Enchantment — Aura | 8 | 66.7% | 4 |
Temporary Lockdown | Enchantment | 6 | 66.3% | 2 |
Steel Seraph | Artifact Creature — Angel | 9 | 65.9% | 4 |
Cards that perform better with Assimilation Aegis than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
---|
Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
---|---|---|---|
Azorius Synthesizer | 9 | 47.4% | 55.8% |
Azorius Glyph | 6 | 5.2% | 95.9% |
Azorius Flash | 5 | 2.2% | 31.4% |
Unknown Archetype | 3 | 1.0% | 16.7% |
1 | 2.1% | 66.7% |
Statistic | Description | Formula |
---|---|---|
Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.